이 노래가 생각날 때가 있다
딱히 뭐 ..
여튼 오늘 학교 갔는데 눈이 제법 내렸다. 학교는 뭐 어떻게 보면 여전하고, 또 많이 바뀌었다면 바뀌었고. 몇 년 있으면 선생님들 다 은퇴하셔서 찾아가도 썰렁 할 것 같아 그리고.
천주교, 개신교, 정교회, 유대교 성직자가 모여 신성에 대해 토론하는 장면인데 굉장히 잘 만들었다, 재밌게.
The nature of the Christ is not quite as simple as your photoplay would have it.
EDDIE How so, Father?
Well, it is not the case simply that Christ is God, or God Christ.
You can say that again! The Nazarene was not God!
PATRIARCH He was not not-God.
RABBI He was a man!
MINISTER Part God.
But Rabbi, we all have a little bit of God in us don’t we?
It is the foundation of our belief that God is tri-partite.
Father, Son, Holy Ghost.
And Christ is most properly referred to as the Son of God. It is the son of God who takes the sins of the world upon himself so that the rest of God’s children, we imperfect beings, through faith, may enter the kingdom of heaven.
So God is... split?
Yes ... And no!
There is unity in division.
And division in unity.
Not sure I follow, Padre.
Young man, you don’t follow for a very simple reason: these man are screwballs.
(to the others)
God has children? What, and a dog? A collie maybe? God doesn’t have children. He’s a bachelor. And very angry.
He used to be angry!
RABBI What, he got over it?
You worship the god of another age!
PRIEST Who has no love!
Not true! He likes Jews.
MINISTER God loves everyone!
PRIEST God is love.
PATRIARCH God is who is.
This is special? Who isn’t who is?
But how should God be rendered in amotion picture?
God is not in the motion picture!
Then who is Todd Hocheiser?
Gentlemen, maybe we’re biting off more than we can chew.